The Industry Wants Safer AI but Disagrees on Who Should Set the Limits.
Companies, governments and researchers differ about standards, audits and responsibilities.
Reference image: OpenAI. Image source ↗
What happened
Companies, governments and researchers differ about standards, audits and responsibilities. The source presents this development in ai & data: The Industry Wants Safer AI but Disagrees on Who Should Set the Limits.
What changes
The new thing is to move from generic assistants to system with context, permits and ability to run jobs within actual processes.
Why it matters
It matters because automating without adequate data, permission and monitoring can accelerate both value and error.
Implications for businesses
A repetitive process with reliable data, clear permits, stock registration and a person with responsibility for revising exceptions should be initiated in Mexico.
One Rhino’s take
Useful AI appears when connected with context and responsibility. Without that cape, automation only produces faster responses.
View original source ↗